Eric Thompson

Children’s Gender Clinic Whistleblower Tells Dr. Phil Patients Were Begging ‘to have breasts put back on’

G! Whistleblower Tells Dr Phil Patients Were Begging ‘to have breasts put back on’In a startling revelation that has sent shockwaves through the medical community and beyond, a whistleblower from a children’s gender clinic has come forward with claims that could ignite a firestorm of controversy.

During an appearance on “Dr. Phil,” Jamie Reed, a former case manager at the Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children’s Hospital, alleged that patients were pleading to reverse their transitions and that superiors instructed staff to remain silent about individuals seeking to detransition.

Reed’s testimony paints a harrowing picture of regret and desperation among young patients who underwent life-altering procedures only to find themselves struggling with the agonizing consequences. “I had teenage girls in my office that had full mastectomies and were begging to have breasts put back on,” Reed disclosed on the show.

This statement alone raises profound questions about the irreversible decisions being made by, or on behalf of, minors in the context of gender transition.

Trending: Lying Biden Suggests His Uncle Was Eaten By ‘Cannibals’ In New Guinea

The implications of Reed’s allegations are far-reaching, suggesting not only potential harm to patients but also an institutional reluctance to acknowledge or address such outcomes. According to Reed, there was an explicit directive from above: “We were told not to talk about it.”

This enforced silence around detransitioning could be seen as an attempt to downplay or dismiss experiences that do not align with prevailing narratives surrounding transgender healthcare.

Jamie Reed worked at The Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children’s Hospital between 2018 and November 2022

The issue at hand is not just medical but deeply personal and societal. The rise in young people identifying as transgender and seeking medical interventions has been met with both support for individual rights and concerns over the speed and permanence of such treatments.

Critics argue that puberty blockers and hormone therapies are being administered too hastily, without adequate consideration for long-term effects or alternative approaches.

Trending: Defiant Speaker Mike Johnson Fights MTG Coupe, ‘I’m Not Resigning.”

Indeed, these interventions are not without risk. Puberty blockers, for instance, can lead to decreased bone density and compromised fertility when used over extended periods.

Hormone therapies may carry cardiovascular risks and other health implications. Yet these potential side effects often seem overshadowed by the urgency placed on affirming a child’s expressed gender identity through medical means.

The debate intensifies when considering surgical interventions like mastectomies or genital surgeries in minors—procedures that are irreversible and life-changing.

The notion of teenagers experiencing such profound regret after undergoing these surgeries is deeply troubling; it suggests a need for more cautious deliberation before embarking on paths that cannot be retraced.

Reed’s account also touches upon another contentious aspect: the pressure felt by medical professionals within gender clinics. If employees are indeed being instructed to keep quiet about detransitioners, this raises serious ethical questions about transparency in healthcare practices and patient outcomes.

This controversy comes amid growing public discourse around transgender issues—a conversation marked by polarized views and heated debates over legislation affecting transgender individuals’ rights. As society contemplates how best to accommodate diverse gender identities while ensuring safe practices in medicine, stories like Reed’s force us into uncomfortable yet necessary examinations of current protocols.

The whistleblower’s revelations have already prompted responses from various corners of society. Dr. Phil McGraw himself took what some might consider a bold stance during his show: “We don’t want people making permanent decisions about temporary feelings.” His words echo concerns shared by many who fear that young people may be encouraged—or even rushed—into life-altering decisions without fully understanding their implications.

As this story unfolds, it will undoubtedly fuel further discussions around age-appropriate care for transgender youth, informed consent processes, mental health considerations prior to transitioning procedures, and support systems for those who choose to detransition.

Jamie Reed’s courage in speaking out against what she perceives as wrongdoing within her former workplace serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in providing care for transgender youth—a reminder that one-size-fits-all solutions may not suffice when dealing with such deeply individual experiences.

While advocates continue pushing for greater acceptance and rights for transgender individuals—a cause rooted in ‘dignity’ and ‘equality’—the voices of those like Jamie Reed insist on pausing amidst rapid advancements in transgender healthcare policies to ask critical questions: Are we moving too fast? Are we listening closely enough? And most importantly—are we doing right by our children?

As society navigates these turbulent waters where personal identity intersects with medical ethics, it becomes clear that there are no easy answers—only difficult conversations ahead as we strive toward understanding how best to support each individual’s journey while safeguarding their well-being now and into the future.


Huge Spring Sale Underway On MyPillow Products

Use Promo Code FLS At Checkout

Inflation Buster: Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans

Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans Same Phones, Same Numbers, Same Coverage For About Half The Price.

About The Author

More Posts

Send Us A Message