Eric Thompson

Snopes FINALLY Corrects The Record On Trump Hoax — 7 Years Later

Eric Thompson Show Podcasts

In a significant and belated correction, the fact-checking website Snopes has acknowledged that former President Donald Trump did not, as widely reported, refer to neo-Nazis and white supremacists as “very fine people” following the 2017 Charlottesville rally.

This admission comes seven years after the initial incident, during which Trump’s comments were persistently misconstrued and exploited for political gain.

The controversy stems from Trump’s remarks after the violent clashes in Charlottesville, Virginia, where a Unite the Right rally, consisting of various right-wing groups, including white supremacists, clashed with counter-protesters.

Trump’s assertion that there were “very fine people on both sides” was swiftly and broadly criticized, with many claiming he was equating neo-Nazis with peaceful protesters.

However, a closer examination of the full transcript from Trump’s press conference reveals that he explicitly condemned the neo-Nazis and white supremacists. Trump stated, “I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally.”

Despite this clarification, the mischaracterization persisted in the media and public discourse, becoming a focal point for accusations of racism against the former president.

Trending: Supreme Court Rules Against Automatic Residency for Noncitizen Spouses

The recent correction by Snopes, a prominent fact-checking entity, marks a notable shift.

In their update, Snopes clarified that Trump did not call neo-Nazis “very fine people” and acknowledged that his comments were directed towards individuals protesting the removal of a Confederate statue who were not associated with extremist groups. This correction rectifies a pervasive and damaging narrative that had remained largely unchallenged by mainstream fact-checkers.

The delay in correcting the record has drawn criticism from conservative commentators and Trump supporters. They argue that the prolonged misrepresentation was a deliberate tactic to undermine Trump’s presidency and fuel division. Critics point out that this false narrative was frequently cited by Trump’s political adversaries and media outlets as evidence of his alleged sympathies with white supremacists.

The mischaracterization of Trump’s Charlottesville remarks became a cornerstone of political rhetoric against him. Joe Biden, for example, cited it as a motivating factor for his presidential run, stating in his campaign announcement video that Trump’s words had revealed a moral failing. The correction by Snopes underscores the enduring impact of misinformation in shaping public opinion and political narratives.

BizPac Review, a conservative news outlet, highlighted the significance of this correction, noting that it took seven years for Snopes to amend the record. They emphasized the importance of accountability in journalism and fact-checking, stressing that such corrections should be made promptly to prevent the spread of false information.

Furthermore, MSN’s coverage of the correction explored the broader implications of the initial misreporting. They pointed out that the persistence of this falsehood contributed to heightened political polarization and damaged the credibility of both media and fact-checking organizations. The acknowledgement by Snopes, while necessary, also serves as a reminder of the need for vigilance and accuracy in reporting.

The correction by Snopes is a stark reminder of the power of media narratives and the responsibility of fact-checking organizations to provide accurate and timely information. In an era where misinformation can rapidly spread and solidify into accepted truth, the integrity of fact-checkers is paramount. This incident illustrates the long-term consequences of misreporting and the importance of rectifying errors to preserve public trust.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the Snopes correction may prompt a reevaluation of other widely held beliefs and statements attributed to political figures. It highlights the critical role of comprehensive and unbiased fact-checking in maintaining an informed electorate and fostering healthy political discourse. The acknowledgement of this significant error, although delayed, is a step towards restoring accuracy and trust in the dissemination of information.

About The Author

More Posts

Send Us A Message