The report’s findings have serious implications for the credibility of the intelligence community and its role in political processes. The use of intelligence resources to influence an election undermines the democratic process and raises questions about the impartiality of those entrusted with national security.
CIA Election Intereference on Hunter Laptop Confirmed! Video:
This revelation also casts a shadow over the Biden administration. The coordination between the CIA and Biden’s campaign to discredit the laptop story suggests a concerted effort to manipulate public opinion and protect political interests. This incident reinforces long-standing concerns about the integrity of Biden’s campaign and administration.
“It’s inappropriate for a currently serving staff officer or contractor to be involved in the political process,” former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell acknowledged to Congress during its investigation of the incident.
Moreover, the media’s role in perpetuating the disinformation narrative cannot be overlooked. Outlets like Politico played a crucial role in disseminating the false narrative, which was then leveraged by Biden during the debates. This collaboration between the media, intelligence community, and political campaign represents a troubling convergence of interests that undermines journalistic integrity and the public’s trust in news sources.
Polling data supports the notion that the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story had a significant impact on the election outcome. A TIPP Insights poll from 2022 revealed that 71% of Americans believed accurate reporting of the laptop’s contents could have altered the 2020 presidential election results.
This incident underscores the necessity for greater transparency and accountability within the intelligence community. The use of intelligence agencies to influence political outcomes poses a grave threat to democratic institutions and must be addressed to prevent future occurrences.
The congressional report calls for a thorough investigation into the actions of the CIA and the individuals involved. It is imperative to restore public trust in the intelligence community and ensure that it operates independently of political pressures.
As the fallout from this report continues, it is clear that the intersection of intelligence and politics requires careful scrutiny. The integrity of the electoral process and the impartiality of those tasked with safeguarding national security are paramount to the health of American democracy. The revelations about the CIA’s interference in the 2020 election serve as a stark reminder of the potential dangers of unchecked political influence within intelligence agencies.
The House Judiciary report on Monday alleged three key facts about the CIA’s involvement in the 2020 election:
• High ranking CIA officials, up to and including then-CIA Director Gina Haspel, were made aware of the Hunter Biden statement prior to its approval and publication. Because several former senior intelligence officials signed the statement, the PCRB sent the draft statement to the CIA’s then-Chief Operating Officer (COO) Andrew Makridis, who said he subsequently informed then-Director Haspel or then-Deputy Director Vaughn Frederick Bishop that the statement would be published soon. Senior CIA leadership had an opportunity at that time to slow down the CIA’s process for reviewing publication submissions and ensure that such an extraordinary statement was properly vetted.
• Some of the statement’s signatories, including Michael Morell, were on active contract with the CIA at the time of the Hunter Biden statement’s publication. Throughout the course of the Committees’ investigation, the signatories claimed to not have had access to any classified information when asserting that the allegations surrounding Hunter Biden’s laptop had “all the hallmarks” of Russian disinformation. However, at the time of the statement’s publication, at least two signatories—Morell and former CIA Inspector General David Buckley—were on the CIA’s payroll as contractors. Due to purported operational concerns, the CIA declined to declassify the entire universe of signatories who were on active contract. In addition, some signatories to the Hunter Biden statement also had special “Green Card” access to the CIA at the time of the statement’s publication, allowing them to gain entry to secure CIA facilities.
• After publication of the Hunter Biden statement, CIA employees internally expressed concern about the statement’s politicized content, acknowledging it was not “helpful to the Agency in the long run.” At least one employee found it “[i]nteresting to see what was submitted and approved” when discussing media talking points that the statement’s co-author, former Senior Intelligence Service Officer Marc Polymeropoulos, submitted related to the statement. When discussing Polymeropoulos’s talking points, another CIA official stated, “It appears [Polymeropoulos] is actively involved in a pro-Biden campaign and may be disclosing classified information in his efforts.” The CIA’s internal review board, known as the Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB), determined that Polymeropoulos’s talking points contained classified information that had to be removed prior to publication.
The full report is here.
Sponsors:
Huge Spring Sale Underway On MyPillow Products
Use Promo Code FLS At Checkout
Inflation Buster: Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans (50% off first month with promo code: FLS)
Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans Same Phones, Same Numbers, Same Coverage For About Half The Price.
About The Author
