The decision to add a large number of surveillance cameras in blue cities and states, in the name of combatting crime, has many concerned.
Oakland, CA which has been struggling with escalating crime rates and is now at the forefront of this controversial approach to law enforcement.
Per an August 2023 report, murders are up 37 percent compared to four years earlier. Robberies jumped 30 percent.
Car break-ins exploded by 40 percent, and car thefts “more than doubled.”
In a sign of desperation, California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) has decided to flood crime-ridden east bay city with 500 surveillance cameras is a stark indicator of how lawlessness in Democrat-led cities is pushing them towards measures that echo shades of fascism.
Newsom said in a news release that the California Highway Patrol has contracted with Flock Safety to install 480 cameras that can identify and track vehicles by license plate, type, color and even decals and bumper stickers. The cameras will provide authorities with real-time alerts of suspect vehicles.
The far-left governor of the formerly known as the “Golden State” said the surveillance network will give law enforcement tools “to effectively combat criminal activity and hold perpetrators accountable — building safer, stronger communities for all Californians.”
Opponents say the technology infringes on privacy and will lead to further police abuse of already marginalized communities.
The introduction of these surveillance cameras comes as a response to the city’s desperate need to curb violence and criminal activities. However, this move has sparked debate among conservatives who view it as a potential overreach of government power, reminiscent of authoritarian regimes.
The situation in Oakland is not an isolated incident.
Chicago, under Mayor Brandon Johnson’s leadership, witnessed at least 32 shootings during Easter weekend alone. This surge in violence underscores a broader trend of out-of-control crime in major cities governed by Democratic officials. Critics argue that such rampant lawlessness is a direct consequence of liberal policies that undermine police authority and fail to hold criminals accountable.
These developments have led some observers to draw parallels between current urban governance and Marxist ideologies. Critics contend that Marxism inevitably leads to governmental actions that disregard individual freedoms and rights – including those of the unborn – in favor of state control. They argue that such ideologies have historically resulted in failure and societal decay.
The pro-life perspective adds another layer to this discourse on governance and public safety.
From this viewpoint, human life begins at conception, making abortion an immoral act at any stage post-conception. The objective for pro-life advocates is clear: protect the lives of the unborn at all costs. Thus, when cities like Oakland and Chicago exhibit high levels of violence and disregard for life through rampant crime or abortion policies, it strikes at the heart of conservative values.
Moreover, conservatives uphold that a strong traditional family structure – consisting of a married father and mother – provides the best environment for raising children. They argue that such families are foundational for instilling values like respect for life and property, which are essential for maintaining social order. As crime rates soar in these blue cities, questions arise about how societal shifts away from traditional family structures may be contributing factors.
The use of surveillance technology as a tool against crime also raises significant privacy concerns among citizens who value individual liberties highly. While proponents may argue that these cameras are necessary for public safety, opponents fear they could be used as instruments for state monitoring beyond their intended purpose.
Governor Newsom’s initiative in Oakland represents an attempt to restore order through technological means; however, it also reflects deeper issues within these communities’ social fabric. The breakdown in respect for law enforcement coupled with policies perceived as soft on crime has created an environment where drastic measures become seemingly necessary responses.
In Chicago’s case, Mayor Johnson faces similar challenges with gun violence plaguing his city’s streets. Despite strict gun control laws already in place – often championed by Democrats – shootings remain alarmingly frequent occurrences. This contradiction between policy intentions and real-world outcomes fuels conservative arguments against what they see as ineffective liberal governance.
As debates continue over how best to address urban crime waves while preserving civil liberties and promoting family values, one thing remains clear: solutions must be found that align with both public safety needs and fundamental principles cherished by conservatives.
The unfolding situation across blue states serves as a cautionary tale about governance approaches disconnected from certain core American values such as life protection from conception onward and support for traditional families as cornerstones for community stability.
While no definitive conclusions can be drawn yet regarding the long-term effects these surveillance measures will have on society’s moral fabric or individual freedoms, they undoubtedly mark a pivotal moment in our ongoing national conversation about security versus liberty—and what it truly means to uphold justice within our communities.
Genesis Gold Group Co-Founder Jonathan Rose Explains the Advantage of Gold and Silver for Retirement
Download my podcasts below:
Sponsors:
Huge Spring Sale Underway On MyPillow Products
Use Promo Code FLS At Checkout
Inflation Buster: Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans
Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans Same Phones, Same Numbers, Same Coverage For About Half The Price.
About The Author
