Fitness Expert Jillian Michaels Blasts California Leftists, Reveals Reason for Fleeing the State (VIDEO)

Below is the transcript of the interview:

Michaels: “So, some of these laws that are passing here are absolutely mind-boggling in relation to crime, protecting our kids. We’re decriminalizing everything, which arguably I would probably be okay with, but we’re not regulating any of it.So it’s like, okay, you’re going to decriminalize sex work, but only so women can legally loiter on the streets. Not to keep them safe, not to have them pay taxes, not to make them regularly check for STDs, not to take away the pimps out of the equipment.If you made that argument to me, I’d be like, ‘Well, yes, we want, of course.’ I could be liberal. I could go there with you. But I grew up this way. But when it’s like, ‘Oh, and then what we’re going to do is we’re going to pass a law for LGBTQ rights so that 24-year-old men can sleep with 14-year-old boys and not have as a sex offender because it’s just not fair to the gays.’ I’m like, what?  That was, I think, early 2020 when they passed that law. I was like, if a 24-year-old man touches my 14-year-old son, I will get it gone and take the hat or seat into my own hands. Are you kidding? Or the fact that a 12-year-old child can be put on off-label cancer drugs to irreparably change their body.Again, if my son came to me and said, ‘Mom, my daughter, I think I’m trans.’ I’d say, ‘Okay, you want to dress this way? You want me to call you whatever the heck you want me to… Fine. Explore it. I love you. I’m cool. Do you as long as we’re safe.’ But we’re not changing your body until it’s fully developed. I’m sorry. Conversation’s over. [Kids] can’t even get a tattoo. It’s insane. I just can’t. It’s madness. It’s madness to me. I could go on and on and on, and it’s madness. I don’t know what’s going on here.”

Jillian Michaels’ pointed critique of California’s progressive policies highlights a growing discontent among residents who feel that the state’s leadership has veered too far into ideological territory. Her comments also reflect broader concerns about public safety, regulatory oversight, and the protection of vulnerable populations. As California continues to grapple with these issues, the voices of critics like Michaels serve as a reminder of the need for balanced and pragmatic governance.