In a move that has sent ripples through the conservative community, President Joe Biden is reportedly considering an executive action that could grant amnesty to over one million illegal aliens. This potential decision, which comes as the 2024 election looms on the horizon, is seen by many as a blatant attempt to circumvent Congress and reshape immigration policy unilaterally.
The heart of the matter lies in the administration’s contemplation of using deferred enforced departure (DED) or temporary protected status (TPS) to prevent the deportation of illegal immigrants who are spouses of U.S. citizens. These measures, traditionally used sparingly for humanitarian reasons or in response to natural disasters and armed conflicts, could be expanded in scope under Biden’s directive.
The Wall Street Journal reports that this consideration is part of a broader review of immigration policies by the Biden administration. The potential beneficiaries are primarily those who entered the country illegally and married U.S. citizens but have been unable to adjust their status due to various complexities in immigration law.
Critics argue that such sweeping use of executive power undermines the rule of law and disregards the legislative process designed to address such significant national issues. They contend that amnesty rewards illegal behavior, encourages further illegal immigration, and places an undue burden on American taxpayers.
"We are increasingly concerned [about] the potential for some kind of coordinated attack here in the homeland."
Even FBI Director Wray acknowledges our open border makes America vulnerable to attack.
While I've been calling for a secure border for years, @RubenGallego called… https://t.co/4v0PXziE5w
— Kari Lake (@KariLake) April 24, 2024
Furthermore, opponents highlight that this move could have profound implications for national security and public safety. By granting legal status en masse without thorough vetting processes, they fear it may inadvertently shield those with nefarious intentions.
The Gateway Pundit echoes these concerns, framing Biden’s potential executive order as “lawless” and indicative of a disregard for legal immigration channels. The publication underscores conservative apprehension about what they perceive as an erosion of sovereign borders and a challenge to American sovereignty itself.
Historically, amnesty programs have been contentious topics in American politics. The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) signed by President Ronald Reagan in 1986 granted amnesty to nearly three million illegal immigrants. While intended as a one-time concession coupled with promises of stronger border control and enforcement measures, many conservatives believe it ultimately led to increased illegal immigration due to expectations of future amnesties.
This man said that he is taking a chance and will definitely vote for Trump because Biden hasn’t done anything for the Black community, Biden’s open border policies, etc… pic.twitter.com/TSNYzdwm0b
— ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể (@TheThe1776) April 24, 2024
This historical context fuels current skepticism among conservatives regarding President Biden’s intentions. They question whether his administration’s actions align with upholding laws enacted by Congress or if they represent an overreach into legislative territory.
Amidst these debates lies a broader conversation about America’s approach to immigration policy—a topic that has long divided politicians and citizens alike. Conservatives often advocate for stricter enforcement of existing laws and enhanced border security measures as means to uphold national sovereignty and protect American workers’ interests.
On the other side are those who argue for more lenient policies towards undocumented immigrants already living in the United States—policies they believe reflect compassion and economic pragmatism given these individuals’ contributions to society.
However, within conservative circles, there is significant pushback against this latter viewpoint. Many hold firm on principles prioritizing legal pathways for entry while addressing border security concerns head-on—a stance they feel is critical for maintaining order and fairness within America’s immigration system.
BIDEN, reading from his teleprompter: "Four more years? Pause?"
It's all completely staged. pic.twitter.com/vqkIt0SSTF
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 24, 2024
As discussions continue around President Biden’s potential executive action on amnesty, it remains clear that any decision will be met with intense scrutiny from conservative observers wary of its implications for America’s future—both politically and socially.
While no official announcement has been made regarding this policy shift at present time, its consideration alone speaks volumes about current administrative priorities concerning immigration reform—a topic sure to remain at the forefront as we inch closer toward another election cycle where every policy decision can sway voter sentiment significantly.
As Americans await further developments on this issue from President Biden’s administration, one thing remains certain: The debate over how best to manage America’s borders will persist unabatedly—each side holding steadfastly onto their convictions about what constitutes just governance in relation to those who seek life within our nation’s bounds without formal authorization.
Biden putting that $3.5 billion Republicans just gave him to use already by opening 2 new immigration field offices in the Middle East.
Imagine watching this whole thing unfold and not knowing this was coming. pic.twitter.com/7mugdYvX1B
— Mel (@Villgecrazylady) April 24, 2024
Sponsors:
Huge Spring Sale Underway On MyPillow Products
Use Promo Code FLS At Checkout
Inflation Buster: Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans
Freedom From High-Cost Cell Plans Same Phones, Same Numbers, Same Coverage For About Half The Price.
About The Author
